Last year, I wrote a great deal about the rise of “ventilation shutdown plus” (VSD+), a method being used to mass kill poultry birds on factory farms by sealing off the airflow inside barns and pumping in extreme heat using industrial-scale heaters, so that the animals die of heatstroke over the course of hours. It is one of the worst forms of cruelty being inflicted on animals in the US food system — the equivalent of roasting animals to death — and it’s been used to kill tens of millions of poultry birds during the current avian flu outbreak.

As of this summer, the most recent period for which data is available, more than 49 million birds, or over 80 percent of the depopulated total, were killed in culls that used VSD+ either alone or in combination with other methods, according to an analysis of USDA data by Gwendolen Reyes-Illg, a veterinary adviser to the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), an animal advocacy nonprofit. These mass killings, or “depopulations,” in the industry’s jargon, are paid for with public dollars through a USDA program that compensates livestock farmers for their losses.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    In case you missed it, I made a point of scoping this ethical question to people who do have the means to make choices with their consumption. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask people to make ethical choices provided that they are able.

    I wouldn’t tell someone not to shoot an oncoming attacker because murder is unethical. In the same vein if someone has no choice in what they can eat, it would be ridiculous to tell them to try to ‘make ethical choices’.

    • Drusas
      link
      fedilink
      -21 year ago

      Shooting an oncoming attacker isn’t murder. Not a great comparison.

      • @max
        link
        51 year ago

        So not the point though

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        That’s fine, you can pick your example of choice then.

        Person A is presented with ethical dilemma X. They are in a position where they can freely make a choice.

        Person B is presented with the same ethical dilemma X. They are not in a position where they are able to freely make a choice.

        Person B is not obligated to try to pick the more ethical choice in dilemma X, since they are unable to freely make a decision.