“It’s clear, we’re heading for something and it seems sooner than ever now. The prophecies do say that Israel will be attacked from all sides, which seems like that’s happening now. And then it says that the Great Bear of the North and the great army from the East will also attack. “And I think …

I’ve got news for you, crackpot. The rapture already happened and you, the self-righteous, have been left behind with us, the great unbelieving. Let that sink in.

  • @[email protected]English
    15•11 months ago

    Because youre ignoring the fact that people in power make decisions based on fiction that affect all of us. That’s the danger

      • EchEnglish
        12•11 months ago

        Well, his series emboldened a new generation of end-times nutters like himself that, at best, ignore critical threats to humanity because it’s “ending soon anyhow”, and at worst actively campaign for disastrous and harmful policies in order to hasten the end of the world and their own entry into “paradise”.

          • spaceghotiM
            4•11 months ago

            The prevalence of Christian Nationalism and the religious comments of conservative politicians for why they oppose progressive legislation would suggest that boosting opinions like this is feeding a problem that’s actively blowing up in our faces right now.

            Sure, atheists aren’t immune to group think and echo chambers, but arguing against the comment you replied to suggests you’re not paying attention to what’s happening around us.

              • spaceghotiM
                3•11 months ago

                Bury your head in the sand if you choose. It won’t save you when they come for all of us.

                  • spaceghotiMEnglish
                    3•11 months ago

                    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/11/19/mike-johnson-legal-filings-00127832

                    So while Johnson’s legal career reflects decades of arguing for free speech and free expression of religion, it has consistently been for the same religion — and not evidently in furtherance of an even-handed legal principle that would protect all religions equally (in addition to the right to reject religion altogether). Johnson’s theory, summed up, appears to be what might be dubbed, “the First Amendment for me but not for thee.” As he has described it in his own words, “the founders wanted to protect the church from the encroaching state, not the other way around.”

                    But only when that church is Christian.

                    I repeat: you are not paying attention.