@PugJesusM to [email protected]English • 1 year agoRed fash saying fash things. "Soft sons"? "Their soldiers aren't warriors"? Straight out of 1930s fascist rhetoric. Or modern Russian rhetoric.imagemessage-square7arrow-up131arrow-down18
arrow-up123arrow-down1imageRed fash saying fash things. "Soft sons"? "Their soldiers aren't warriors"? Straight out of 1930s fascist rhetoric. Or modern Russian rhetoric.@PugJesusM to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square7
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoIt’s so they can beat it out of the area when they face the consequences of their own actions, and then bitch about it in the place they went to. “it was all the righties who corrupted the movement into killing the academics and dissidents and totally not our own rhetoric run amok”
minus-squarePugJesuslinkfedilink1•1 year ago“But also the academics and dissidents deserved it and it was based.”
Oh, shit, is that why the tankies love red so much?
It’s so they can beat it out of the area when they face the consequences of their own actions, and then bitch about it in the place they went to.
“it was all the righties who corrupted the movement into killing the academics and dissidents and totally not our own rhetoric run amok”
“But also the academics and dissidents deserved it and it was based.”