@PoseidonsWake to LinuxEnglish • 1 year agoTux Machines — It's False: Those Are Not Alternatives to LibreOffice. They're Proprietary or Not Maintained.news.tuxmachines.orgmessage-square7arrow-up164arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up162arrow-down1external-linkTux Machines — It's False: Those Are Not Alternatives to LibreOffice. They're Proprietary or Not Maintained.news.tuxmachines.org@PoseidonsWake to LinuxEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square7file-text
THE site “It’s FOSS” suggests alternatives to FOSS. At least half of those alternatives are NOT FOSS, so why bother? █
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 year agoGenerally I agree with the sentiment of the article, although I don’t get why OnlyOffice is called proprietary, as it’s licensed under the AGPL as far as I know…
Generally I agree with the sentiment of the article, although I don’t get why OnlyOffice is called proprietary, as it’s licensed under the AGPL as far as I know…
it is agpl3, repos are https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/