The age old dichotomy between what is a grossly perverse, voyeuristic effort by the artist, and what is a bold, profound realization by male viewers that it is not, in fact, wildly immature or degrading to say that women do in fact have breasts on their body.
Drawing something slightly above stick figures and adding crude features without a touch of irony or value to the joke makes this an uncomfortable comic at best. Why not draw breasts on the fish? You said the truth out loud better than I could have. It’s the first one.
I’m high again and looked at this comic for a while trying to figure out why I don’t like it.
The attention to detail is unsettling. Why go to the effort of drawing a bulge and tits on characters whose design includes low effort mitten hands?
Because the tits show the character’s gender. Articulated fingers don’t.
The age old dichotomy between what is a grossly perverse, voyeuristic effort by the artist, and what is a bold, profound realization by male viewers that it is not, in fact, wildly immature or degrading to say that women do in fact have breasts on their body.
This time I think it’s the second one.
Drawing something slightly above stick figures and adding crude features without a touch of irony or value to the joke makes this an uncomfortable comic at best. Why not draw breasts on the fish? You said the truth out loud better than I could have. It’s the first one.
Are you this uncomfortable when you watch cartoons like Scooby-Doo or SpongeBob and female characters with breasts appear on screen
Usually not.
nah, I think it’s the ugly creepy faces