I did, there was zero impetus for the police to use lethal force. He was refusing to answer their questions. The people from the domestic violence incident had left, and if he matched the description of those people it would have been mentioned.
They didn’t have a basis for detaining him, and they didn’t have a crime they were investigating. If they thought they had either of these things it’s because they didn’t do their job.
This is another instance of police officers deciding to restrict the lawful activities of citizens.
Back off and follow him?
Did you even read the article? You sound clueless. Read the article ffs.
I did, there was zero impetus for the police to use lethal force. He was refusing to answer their questions. The people from the domestic violence incident had left, and if he matched the description of those people it would have been mentioned.
They didn’t have a basis for detaining him, and they didn’t have a crime they were investigating. If they thought they had either of these things it’s because they didn’t do their job.
This is another instance of police officers deciding to restrict the lawful activities of citizens.
The problem with people like you is you don’t know how delicious those boots taste, or you’d be licking them too
Are you speaking from experience