Yes, the meme is clearly trying to deny the use of human shields without having to say it. I was hoping OP or even you’d have balls to be honest about it, but that’s not happening.
I’m not a native speaker so you can chalk it up to that, so it’s not as embarrassing when I call you out on not having the balls to stand behind your convictions. I’m giving you an easy way out there, might as well take it.
Yes, the meme is clearly trying to deny the use of human shields without having to say it. I was hoping OP or even you’d have balls to be honest about it, but that’s not happening.
I’m not a native speaker so you can chalk it up to that, so it’s not as embarrassing when I call you out on not having the balls to stand behind your convictions. I’m giving you an easy way out there, might as well take it.
deleted by creator
Did you not see the first panel?
How would you even be killing humans shields who don’t exist?
deleted by creator
I’m sorry but that doesn’t make sense, the wording is messed up. Which is funny because you wrote this to me:
But in any case, it’s not a case of “if” they’re using human shields. They are using human shields.
deleted by creator
I think it would be even better not to take human shields to begin with. The whole point of human shields is to put them into harms way.
Can’t kill human shields if you don’t take them *taps head*
deleted by creator
Interesting attitude