Also, how can you be aged 16 and below? I know, not technically the software’s fault, but still…

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -21 year ago

    Your child can’t be both 16 and below. It’s understandable but wrong. If they’d written it in the form “All children 16 and below …” it would have been ok.

    But still, how do you answer it for a 17-year-old?

    • @Sanyanov
      link
      311 months ago

      “16 and below” is a completely normal phrasing.

      I’m only concerned about no option being there for, you know, kids above 16 :D

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        In this instance, “If your child is 16 and below” could be better expressed as “If your child is 16 or below” since it only has a singlular subject.

        “All children 16 and below…” Perfectly cromulent.

        “If your child is 16 and below…” Awkward.