@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agoWe've come a long way babyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up11.6Karrow-down133 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.56Karrow-down1imageWe've come a long way babyi.imgur.com@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square103fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish20•edit-21 year agosome explanation To be fair, they used setTimeout() and not thread.sleep() because the latter isn’t possible out of the box in JS ^^
minus-square@Wild_Masticlink14•edit-21 year ago Users who have ad blockers installed may experience suboptimal viewing Yeah let me turn off the adblocker just for having an even more suboptimal viewing due to ads. They’re lunatics.
minus-squareThorned_Roselinkfedilink3•1 year agoThanks for the explainer! Also, Google’s response is such a crock of shit.
some explanation
To be fair, they used setTimeout() and not thread.sleep() because the latter isn’t possible out of the box in JS ^^
Yeah let me turn off the adblocker just for having an even more suboptimal viewing due to ads. They’re lunatics.
Thanks for the explainer! Also, Google’s response is such a crock of shit.