A federal appeals court on Tuesday struck down Maryland’s handgun licensing law, finding that its requirements, which include submitting fingerprints for a background check and taking a four-hour firearms safety course, are unconstitutionally restrictive.

In a 2-1 ruling, judges on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond said they considered the case in light of a U.S. Supreme Court decision last year that “effected a sea change in Second Amendment law.”

The underlying lawsuit was filed in 2016 as a challenge to a Maryland law requiring people to obtain a special license before purchasing a handgun. The law, which was passed in 2013 in the aftermath of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, laid out a series of necessary steps for would-be gun purchasers: completing four hours of safety training that includes firing one live round, submitting fingerprints and passing a background check, being 21 and residing in Maryland.

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, a Democrat, said he was disappointed in the circuit court’s ruling and will “continue to fight for this law.” He said his administration is reviewing the ruling and considering its options.

  • BombOmOm
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Exactly. If you murder someone, you will also not be protected by the right to keep and bear arms. In general, instigating harm against others is never covered by rights.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Now if only we could implement some sort of way to maybe check if someone has some disqualifying action in their past so we can make sure that right is adequately protected without risk of further harm. Maybe we could have like a check in the person’s background and make sure they know how to use it properly so we know they aren’t falling into the wrong hands.

      • @kautau
        link
        21 year ago

        Nope, that won’t work. Sigh. Looks like there’s “no way to prevent this.” Crazy that this is the “only nation where this regularly happens.”

      • @SupraMario
        link
        -11 year ago

        Are you assuming that someone who knows they are not allowed to carry would go through a BG check and Finger prints…in order to be told they can’t carry? Really??? That’s the logic you’re going with?

        • @Maggoty
          link
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Are you assuming they’d stay away from buying guns if there wasn’t a verification system? That the honor system would work here?

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      You losing your protection for having a gun does nothing to help the person that you killed with it.