• @guriinii
    link
    141 year ago

    That’s a leap. It means an end to the illegal occupation, apartheid, and Zionism. Give the land back to the indigenous people. I’ve seen talks of the establishment of a secular state where all can be free, which is the ideal here. Not the genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians

    • @grue
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Give the land back to the indigenous people.

      That’s easy to say, but means nothing until you define who the “indigenous people” are, which is an extremely fraught topic in this particular case.

      • @guriinii
        link
        11 year ago

        People indigenous to the land. It’s fairly simple. White European ashkanazi Jews whose descendants lived there 2000 years ago aren’t indigenous. They’re white, white people aren’t from the Middle East, Arabs are.

    • @Globeparasite
      link
      21 year ago

      Give the land back to the indigenous people

      Oh my sweet, sweet summer child. That’s a statement both sides agree on, but not in the way you think

      • Karyoplasma
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        The indigenous people are the (presumably) mesopotamian nomads that eventually became sedentary farmers in the early stages of the Bronze Age.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Are there any of them trying to lay claim to it? And I was making the point that saying one side is fighting for its indigenous land is true for both sides in the conflict, and is pointless to say as a result.

          • Karyoplasma
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Are there any of them trying to lay claim to it?

            Yes. Both the Israelis and the Palestinians probably descended from them. Their common ancestor was first.

              • Karyoplasma
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So are the Palestinians. Your point?

                The nomads turned settlers were not Jewish. Jews didn’t exist back then.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  That is my point. Saying the Palestinians are fighting colonizers for their indigenous land is incorrect and stupid because both sides of the conflict are indigenous to the land.

    • @JoeHill
      link
      -191 year ago

      Right…

      You just called for the destruction of Israel. You just said Tel Aviv, which was built on land purchased from the Bedouin, is on occupied land.

      You just said that Be’eri is on occupied land. Since it’s on occupied land, then Hamas’ murder of 100 people is justified in your mind.

      Palestinian policemen massacred non-Zionist Jews in Hebron in 1929. The government of Gaza massacred left-wing Jews in Be’eri in 2023. And you sit here and talk binational bullshit fantasies.

      From the river to the sea, you want it to be Judenfrei.

      • @ghostdoggtv
        link
        31 year ago

        If not destroyed, at the very least reconstituted and subject to Hague tribunals

        • @JoeHill
          link
          11 year ago

          What does “reconstituted” mean?

        • @Globeparasite
          link
          -21 year ago

          If anyone actually bring the Palestinian government to the Hague the country disappear. Without even talking about the two whole ass civil wars they triggered but they also gave a province to international terrorists.

          This is btw one of the main reaso I think big countries like France only recognizing Palestine as a “delegation” is actually the best : they recognize their authority and legitimacy but don’t have to treat them like they have the same responsibilities and accountability as a state. If France treated Palestine as a full blown state the situation would be dangerously close to having the Foreign Legion marching in Jericho