• blazera
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Well, for anyone that cares, she’s been a promoter of ranked choice voting.

    • BigFig
      link
      English
      251 year ago

      Cool she was also out here being a fucking vaccine skeptic while people died

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -101 year ago

        i like her, but this is a legitimate criticism and not a whacked out conspiracy theory. i don’t care to debate it, either. it’s actually a very valid reason to dislike her and prefer that she not hold public office. it’s not disqualifying for me, personally, but i can respect people who take this position on it. at least you aren’t screaming about meaningless bullshit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That probably sounded smart in your head, but it’s a different level when a judge rules against your ridiculous election challenge lawsuit while calling it “daft,” “ill-considered,” and "pointless.”

          “Dr. Stein publicly announced that she seeks to promote election integrity,” the judge continued. But really, he argued, “she seeks to promote only herself,” adding that there was one other benefit from her litigation “that would not otherwise have been conferred: the payment of $150,000 to Stein’s lawyers.”

          https://www.businessinsider.com/jill-stein-still-owes-fec-campaign-finance-penalites-2020-10

          I can’t be bothered to summarize the rest for you. Read it yourself.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            she was challenging the election of trump in that lawsuit. and yet, she is accused of helping him win.