The International Cricket Council has become the latest sports body to ban transgender players from the elite women’s game if they have gone through male puberty.

The ICC said it had taken the decision, following an extensive scientific review and nine-month consultation, to “protect the integrity of the international women’s game and the safety of players”.

It joins rugby union, swimming, cycling, athletics and rugby league, who have all gone down a similar path in recent years after citing concerns over fairness or safety.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    The one where trans women play in the women’s league and trans men in the men’s. If it causes any sort on unfairness we would have seen it by now.

    • @kerrypacker
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      We have. That’s why it’s a dumb idea.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Where? All the hyped up news stories have been titles like “trans woman destroys women in insert sport here” but if you look into it they took 600th or something and beat maybe 10 women.

    • GreenM
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That is what tons of folks fights against. But i agree it makes sense. However, is taking testosteron considered doping for females or is it OK? if it’s OK, why other “chems” are not allowed?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        The testosterone for trans men is just to get to the levels that average cis men have, I’m pretty sure they test for excess testosterone. Some medication is allowed for sick athletes that is considered doping for anyone who isn’t sick, like the therapy for increasing blood oxygen levels which is a common form of doping but is a valid treatment for some illnesses.

        • GreenM
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Medication for sick people seems kinda different thing to me than being healthy and chumming chems to gain muscles.

          So testosterone for female( born) athletes should be allowed until they reach avg male(born) level? Is that really a thing we want to introduce into sports ? Will steroids also count as getting to avg male upper muscle mass ? Where is the line? Won’t that make female athletes either obsolete or force them to chems chumming which then can cause them health issues given that most of them propably don’t plan to transition and might want start families etc?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            For trans men they get like an injection of testosterone, they aren’t getting it to play sports, it’s medication for dysphoria. I haven’t said anyone else other than trans men should be taking it and definitely nothing about steroids.

            • GreenM
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              The point i wanted to send across is that it gives athlete an advantage. So people will be incentivized to get it. And also those who do not get it will be at disadvantage. So if one form of chems advantage is allowed why others are not? Isn’t that exactly the source of the issue here, fairness?

                • GreenM
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  What do you mean? I explained it in the posts above. So shortly It’s basic biolgy. E.g. testosterone makes changes in the body.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    If you have the same testosterone levels as everyone you are competing against it doesn’t give you an advantage.