It is utterly impossible to use “human shields” against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn’t give a damn about (supposed) “human shields.”
Again (for the really terminally white supremacist).
It is utterly impossible to use “human shields” against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn’t give a damn about (supposed) “human shields.”
Again (for the really, really terminally white supremacist).
It is utterly impossible to use “human shields” against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn’t give a damn about (supposed) “human shields.”
It is utterly impossible to use “human shields” against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn’t give a damn about (supposed) “human shields.”
I’m not sure what you’re hoping to achieve with this. Just repeating your argument again and again won’t make it any better or more truthful. If you just want the last word, honestly just tell me and I’ll give it to you. I don’t mind
Oh no I broke the bot
Again (for the terminally white supremacist).
It is utterly impossible to use “human shields” against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn’t give a damn about (supposed) “human shields.”
Literal spam
Again (for the really terminally white supremacist).
It is utterly impossible to use “human shields” against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn’t give a damn about (supposed) “human shields.”
Unsubscribe
Again (for the really, really terminally white supremacist).
It is utterly impossible to use “human shields” against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn’t give a damn about (supposed) “human shields.”
Jokes aside, is everything alright with you? I’m asking because you’ve been spamming that same thing for a while now. I’m a bit concerned, is all.
…aaaaaaaaand again.
It is utterly impossible to use “human shields” against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn’t give a damn about (supposed) “human shields.”
I’m not sure what you’re hoping to achieve with this. Just repeating your argument again and again won’t make it any better or more truthful. If you just want the last word, honestly just tell me and I’ll give it to you. I don’t mind