I once heard that in the middle of 20th century, public transportation in the USA was widely privatized and bought by automotive manufacturers, and then wilfully left to rot, so that people would buy more cars.

However, I can’t find anything backing that up. Do you know whether that’s true, and where I can find some sources for that?

  • @Twentytwodividedby7
    link
    61 year ago

    Well, if you can’t find anything to confirm your bias, then it is probably wrong. Public Transit often loses money and is owned and operated by government.

    • @theherk
      link
      49
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is worth noting that “loses money” and “costs money” are generally just differences of perspective. For many, public services don’t necessarily need to be profitable monetarily to be worth their cost.

      eta: I would like to clarify that this is in no way disagreement. More of a yes-and, than a but. I agree with you completely.

      • yyyesss?
        link
        251 year ago

        I love that distinction. And where does the money go? “Lose money” implies it vanishes, which isn’t the case. It goes to companies that then pay their workers. It circulates which should be the point.

          • @KepBen
            link
            41 year ago

            The military budget alone is in the trillions and they’ve apparently never “wasted” or “lost” a cent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Public transport almost never runs a profit on it’s own, but if you manage it through the government, then the added tax income from vastly more people being able to work better jobs, more than make up the shortfall.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      It was not built by government though. Railways, streetcars, etc. were private for profit enterprises, that later were acquired by governments.