Hi, mostly i use REHL based distros like Centos/Rocky/Oracle for the solutions i develop but it seems its time to leave…

What good server/minimal distro you use ?

Will start to test Debian stable.

  • Sw00$h
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    You basically recommend to burn money.

    Not because of Arch itself and its quality, but because you need to constantly monitor the mailing list for issues and you need to plan a lot more downtimes due to reboot. This is not gonna happen in businesses.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      if you need reliable uptime you are in need of redundant servers and at that point you can just apply updates and reboot the servers concurrently

      • Sw00$h
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Businesses rely on stable server and applications. Stable in the sense of API/ABI stable. You want an application behave exactly the same on day one and on the last day before eol of the server OS.

        Arch is pure chaos and it could completely change how things work and break commercial third party apps on that server on potentially every day. And you would not necessarily notice the error until its to late and your data is corrupted.

        You don’t trow money at a your server infrastructure to get redundant servers to finally be able to use Arch somewhat stable. And why should a business not use that redundancy for an LTS distro to get even more stability and safety of operations.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Regardless of the distro, unless you use Kernel live patching (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel_live_patching) you should boot a new Kernel when it is released by your distro with a security warning. Running unpatched old Kernels just for 100% uptime is not safe.

          Oh and, I never had issues with Arch changing spontaneously - what event are you speaking of?