• @Cort
      link
      English
      231 year ago

      No, it’s a ‘paradox of tolerance’ and that paradox is already solved

      • @Feathercrown
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        Quick someone post the social contract image

      • @muntedcrocodile
        link
        English
        -131 year ago

        By already solved i assume you mean every philosopher throughput history has a different opinion?

        • @APassenger
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          No.

          Google it. Or Bing or DDG… Put it into your search engine of choice.

    • @firewyre
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      That’s what those fuckers want you to think.

      • @muntedcrocodile
        link
        English
        -111 year ago

        So its ok when we silence a group of people for their beliefs but not when they do it?

        • @cmhe
          link
          English
          15
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you want a tolerant society, you cannot tolerate the intolerant.

          If you want democracy, you must suppress anti-democratic ideas.

          You have to fight for want you believe in, and not let antithetical ideas fester and subvert yours, just because they exploit your tolerance and use the space you give them to fight it.

          • @momo420
            link
            English
            -11 year ago

            Sure, but your methodology for determining what is an anti-democratic idea should be really tight, before you raid/arrest people.

            No one wants murders in their society, but showing that they did that action is more important than stating that an action is wrong/anti-democratic/immoral etc.

              • @momo420
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                In this case if they have evidence, they should be investigated as is being done.

                My critique is on the general sense of tolerance/intolerance as that can be vague, although unjustified incitement of violence or violent action is a good place to draw a line. However what is a call to violence can be tricky to parse sometimes.

          • Tedesche
            link
            English
            -61 year ago

            If you want a tolerant society, you cannot tolerate the intolerant

            That doesn’t mean silencing anyone who utters “wrongspeak,” but authoritarians like you are pushing precisely that. “We shall decide who the intolerant are and they shall be banned from our tolerant society.” I would much rather live in a world where I had to listen to ignorant views like yours than be “protected” from them but never forced to figure out for myself why I disagree. Bigotry flourishes in darkness; the solution is to bring it out into the light.

          • @muntedcrocodile
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            So we should silence all the religouse fundamentalists as well?

              • @muntedcrocodile
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                But the actual content of what these people said hasnt been published so we dont knwo if they where callibg for vilence. Maybw they where just being hatefull?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If they call for genocide? Yes, of course.

              What makes you think society should just sit idly by and do nothing when people call for mass murder and genocide?