• @Madison420
    link
    21 year ago

    Yes things that require expert opinion and very thorough investigation. Not investigative journalists and Israeli meddling.

    Not at all, most credible experts are withholding opinion until there’s an investigation especially given Israels track record of striking hospitals and lying about it namely one that was claimed to be a misfired rocket in prior years.

    • @LordOfTheChia
      link
      -11 year ago

      Yes things that require expert opinion and very thorough investigation. Not investigative journalists and Israeli meddling.

      Then you didn’t read the articles I linked. Full stop.

      Have you tried actually reading instead of mindlessly commenting and down voting anything that doesn’t agree with your prejudices?

      • @Madison420
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did, they mention third party opinion from people who haven’t been there, haven’t been allowed full unfettered access and only do so at the whim of Israel and after Israel had been left alone with the scene. Nothing suspicious there.

        I downvote things that are factually incorrect, you’ve not nor had Israel proven anything. They infer, imply and implicate, prove is not something isrealis do well or honestly willingly.

        • @LordOfTheChia
          link
          -1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          prove is not something isrealis do well or honestly willingly.

          And there is the crux of your argument and your bias.

          1500 comments on Lemmy but you add very little of value. Your existence seems to be dedicated to only wasting strangers’ time.

          That’s just sad, man.

          Congratulations on being the first on my block list, troll.

          • @Madison420
            link
            21 year ago

            Facts aren’t biased, Israel gets caught lying constantly. Factual history isn’t biased it just is.

            Aww neat, way to admit to stalking my profile.

            Something is sad here, in that we agree but likely for different reasons.

            Neat.