Sam Altman, the recently fired (and rehired) chief executive of Open AI, was asked earlier this year by his fellow tech billionaire Patrick Collison what he thought of the risks of synthetic biology. ‘I would like to not have another synthetic pathogen cause a global pandemic. I think we can all agree that wasn’t a great experience,’ he replied. ‘Wasn’t that bad compared to what it could have been, but I’m surprised there has not been more global coordination and I think we should have more of that.’

  • @MataVatnik
    link
    English
    -1510 months ago

    I guess most people aren’t up to date with this subject. There has been plenty of discussion with experts that point to the possibility of a lab leak. The wet market hypothesis has so many holes in it that it’s impossible to take seriously.

    • iAmTheTot
      link
      fedilink
      1410 months ago

      The wet market hypothesis has so many holes in it that it’s impossible to take seriously.

      Such as?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1510 months ago

        Trust me bro! Idk lol

        That kind of comment is useless. Huge claim, zero follow-through. There may well be a workable theory, but that poster has no fucking clue.

      • @MataVatnik
        link
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Simply, Coronavirus is airborne, not transmitted through surfaces or dead meat. While one of the first persons may have been in the wetmarket but it is highly unlikely that it’s where it originated. Chinese government also had heavy oversight over the investigation and did not allow investigations to go beyond the wetmarket. The narrative of the wetmarket was never scientifically verified, it was just something that was published in the early days of the pandemic and taken as fact. The only american allowed into the investigation had a serious conflict of interest with his stake in research in the Wuhan virology lab and was the person who pushed through the wetmarket hypothesis and politically assisnated any scientist that brought up the possibility of a lab leak (even just to discuss). There were more problematic things revolving this person including rejected research proposals in the US with DARPA related to gain of function with coronavirus (there is more there than im saying). In wuhan, the closest bats with this virus live 100s of miles away from the city, there were no cases of this virus seen in the countryside in the early days. The Wuhan lab had a library of coronavirus genomes, 3 years later they still haven’t published it. This would help pinpoint the origin of the virus.

        It’s been a couple years since I dove into this, but there is way more. Especially on the side of the Wuhan virologylab. Point is, we can’t say it’s from a wetmarket any more than it’s from a lableak. The Chinese government hasn’t been cooperative in the investigation so well never be able to draw solid conclusions.

        • @ultranaut
          link
          English
          610 months ago

          The market where it’s believed to have originated kept live animals. It’s never been claimed that the initial infection was via “dead meat” or from a contaminated surface.

        • @ultranaut
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          deleted by creator