• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    331 year ago

    gotta agree with you

    most cops here (slovenia) actually do help the community they serve

    i remember getting pissed on reddit because someone used a slovene police officer on a horse to promote ACAB while ignoring the entire backstory of the picture which contradicted their entire post

    the whole world isnt the same as the US or western europe

    AND BEFORE I GET CALLED A BOOTLICKER

    i support neither the ACAB movement nor the corrupt cops that try their hardest to power trip over innocent people

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        ACAB states that there are inherent problems in the concept of the police. The first “A” stands for “all”, after all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Some tankies claim that Sovjet, GDR, or Chinese police are/were based and still shout “ACAB”, because they just dislike liberal capitalism police.

            They should be reminded of the first “A”.

            • @Candelestine
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              In authoritarian structures, the facts are dictated by the authority, not reality. When the authority and reality come into conflict, and you choose to side with reality, you are at danger of bodily harm or death.

              Many people consider life and death to be more important than what letters and words mean, so I would imagine your proposal is simply impossible at any large scale, in any place where the people more inclined towards uprisings have already been killed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          I sm not sure the concept itself is bad, though I absolutely admit that I don’t know the stated concept of the police.

          To me it is “uphold the rule of law”, but that might just be me hoping it is that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            The critique is a bit too broad to explain simply in a lemmy post.

            I can try, but keepin mind that this will not be exhaustive:

            The police’s job is to reinforce the current power structures and keep the people that currently are in power at the top. That has been their historical purpose, too. Dating back to the 1800s when they violently beat down strikes and workers’ protests. They are always “legitimized” by “the rule of law” without adressing how legitimate the law is. Speznaz, Gestapo and the Stasi all “upheld the rule of law”, but where highly immoral. The same goes for Frontex.

            When the police acts immorally and/or breaks the law, the social structures most likely will prevent repercussions for those police officers. If you get beat up by police, other officers will pretty much always cover for their colleagues.

            The image of the police’s job being to “protect and serve” is the result of active police propaganda (so-called “Copaganda”)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              I see what you are saying, and while I disagree that the concept is to reinforce the current power structures and keep the people currently in power at the top, that is the end result of upholding the rule of law.

              Eh, it’s mostly splitting hairs at this point anyway, the police uphold the laws as written by the people in power which usually benefits themselves.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  That is fair, I find that it can simplify too much in some cases, but eh, I am very seldom in a position of power to have to actually answer these questions, so these concepts are purely academic to me.

    • Chigüir
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Just a clarification:

      You will not be called a “bootlicker” because you support think cops are there to protect you. That’s something reasonable to believe.

      You will be called a “bootlicker” because you are in support of the state, which defends the interest of those in power (aka. political class, “the rich,” bourgeoisie, etc) and its soldiers, which are cops.

      I mean no harm; I’m not calling you a “bootlicker.” You are a decent human just sharing your experience. I want to bring “the other side” perspective in a friendly way. I was thinking like you until I was at the other end of their macanas for helping other decent people.

      The ACAB is a widespread movement in South America and has good reasons to exist since it is adjacent to Antifa. But the overall reason to hate cops is based on the argument that I explained before in a very brief way.

      Since I abide by the movement, I invite you to check it out so you can engage more deeply in the conversation. For a starter, I may interest you in:

      And sorry for not sharing other voices outside the anglosphere who cover the topic. It is just that they don’t speak English, so we can’t understand each other.

      Take care, fellow stranger.