@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoYou are wrong.sopuli.xyzimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1532arrow-down118
arrow-up1514arrow-down1imageYou are wrong.sopuli.xyz@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink35•1 year agoI tried to correct someone’s grammar and someone else wrote a multi-paragraph response on why “should of” is an acceptable alternative to “should have”. Best interaction of my life, unironically
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•1 year agoThe best part is their autocorrect changed it to “should have”, so they said something like “should have is just as correct as should have”
minus-square@EmpathicVagrantlink10•1 year agoThere’s no reason a civil discussion can’t be had, even when the other person insists on being confidently incorrect.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•edit-21 year agoBut it’s really funny to watch, especially if both of them are wrong and won’t back down
minus-squareMonkElinkfedilink1•1 year ago@flashgnash @EmpathicVagrant That’s a post I’ll want infinite scroll for!
minus-squareSnot FlickermanlinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoKind of like the more proper “hell of” instead of “hella.”
I tried to correct someone’s grammar and someone else wrote a multi-paragraph response on why “should of” is an acceptable alternative to “should have”.
Best interaction of my life, unironically
The best part is their autocorrect changed it to “should have”, so they said something like “should have is just as correct as should have”
Damn, I remember that discussion.
There’s no reason a civil discussion can’t be had, even when the other person insists on being confidently incorrect.
But it’s really funny to watch, especially if both of them are wrong and won’t back down
@flashgnash @EmpathicVagrant
That’s a post I’ll want infinite scroll for!
Just curious, what was the main gist of their argument?
Kind of like the more proper “hell of” instead of “hella.”