An exceptionally well explained rant that I find myself in total agreement with.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    I agree that they should be allowed a profit. However calling it open source when redistributing rhel code causes them to hold the right of canceling you access to the code and binary, eventhough gpl states that redistributing is a right under gpl rubs me the wrong way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -161 year ago

      But they’re not canceling access to the code. All that is still there under CentOS Stream.

      • @MrPenguinSky
        link
        English
        91 year ago

        Not really, CentOS Stream tracks ahead of RHEL and isn’t bug for bug compatible, which is also something that Rocky and Alma wants and needs to be.