• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -61 year ago

    Lmao funny how you have to cite bullshit from a known propaganda factory that intentionally ignores the overwhelming majority of data just to find the one place the stats line up in your favor.

    • PizzaMan
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Lmao funny how you have to cite bullshit from a known propaganda factory

      It’s Stanford…

      that intentionally ignores the overwhelming majority of data

      For there being an “overwhelming majority of data” that supports your conclusion, you have yet to cite a single source. How strange.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -61 year ago

        I have, multiple fucking times, and all you do is dismiss them out of hand and try to pivot back to your constructed narrative, so why would I keep trying when you’ve overwhelmingly proven facts are irrelevant to your narrative?

        • PizzaMan
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If I am being honest, I don’t remember the things you’ve cited in the past. I was talking about this thread.

          You using slurs and getting banned for it has been way more memorable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -61 year ago

            Of course you don’t remember the facts that are inconvienient to the narrative you want to push. Because the only reason you’re here is to push your worthless propaganda.

            • PizzaMan
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Of course you don’t remember the facts that are inconvienient to the narrative you want to push.

              Nah, I just don’t have the time/energy to remember some sitation from several weeks ago from somebody who uses slurs for fun. I have better things to remember.

              Let me know when you have an actual argument for the gun debate.