• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -61 year ago

    Lmao tell me you’re just posting outrage without reading the article without telling me.

    If you had been bothered to read before making a retarded quip, you’d notice that the rejection by judge was because the ballot measure was not specific enough, and was just meant to tack a bunch of stuff on such that it could get passed simply by being attached to a different issue.

    If you don’t see why that’s not how things should run, I only assume you’re the one person on earth who isn’t a corrupt politician that just absolutely salivates over every god awful omnibus bill with hundreds of riders for random garbage

    • @ChonkyOwlbear
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      So your argument is the public is too stupid to decide ballot measures by themselves?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        No. It’s quite telling that you refuse to address the actual reason, and are just trying to pin it off on anything else. Perhaps there’s a reason you’re so incredibly pissy that these issues can’t just all be slammed into one omnibus package, but rather have to be individually voted on?

        • @ChonkyOwlbear
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          It’s pretty dishonest to call it an omnibus package. It all comes down to whether or not you think the government should have the power to regulate a person’s fertility and childbearing. That is hardly the limited type of government conservatives say they support.