ThrowawayM to [email protected] • 1 year agoPentagon fails audit for sixth year in a rowwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up182arrow-down131file-text
arrow-up151arrow-down1external-linkPentagon fails audit for sixth year in a rowwww.reuters.comThrowawayM to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePizzaManlinkfedilink2•1 year agoWhy would I need to save it when there is already pre-existing history? This year: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-31/us-defense-hawks-push-for-more-military-spending-despite-bloat https://www.defensenews.com/congress/budget/2023/03/10/gop-blasts-inadequate-biden-defense-budget-as-it-vows-spending-cuts/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep27719 2016: https://www.republicanviews.org/republican-views-on-defense-spending/ https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/06/politics/donald-trump-defense-spending-sequester/index.html https://archive.thinkprogress.org/the-republicans-military-budget-could-make-every-homeless-person-in-america-a-millionaire-1c5f2c2b4c1b/ 2006: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/03/17/congress-raises-ceiling-for-borrowing-span-classbankhead100-billion-is-spent-without-offsetting-cutsspan/18d86b47-47e1-4509-83ab-fd95faaff601/ Pick any year within the last two decades and you can pretty easily find an article about republicans pushing for or having a high military budget. That trend is not changing any time soon.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoI was referring to the next instance. I get your point.
minus-squarePizzaManlinkfedilink4•1 year agoI know, I was just trying to hammer home my point. Sorry if it came across as aggressive.
Why would I need to save it when there is already pre-existing history?
This year:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-31/us-defense-hawks-push-for-more-military-spending-despite-bloat
https://www.defensenews.com/congress/budget/2023/03/10/gop-blasts-inadequate-biden-defense-budget-as-it-vows-spending-cuts/
https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep27719
2016:
https://www.republicanviews.org/republican-views-on-defense-spending/
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/06/politics/donald-trump-defense-spending-sequester/index.html
https://archive.thinkprogress.org/the-republicans-military-budget-could-make-every-homeless-person-in-america-a-millionaire-1c5f2c2b4c1b/
2006:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/03/17/congress-raises-ceiling-for-borrowing-span-classbankhead100-billion-is-spent-without-offsetting-cutsspan/18d86b47-47e1-4509-83ab-fd95faaff601/
Pick any year within the last two decades and you can pretty easily find an article about republicans pushing for or having a high military budget. That trend is not changing any time soon.
I was referring to the next instance. I get your point.
I know, I was just trying to hammer home my point. Sorry if it came across as aggressive.