Passengers who booked trips have been told refunds will be issued in monthly installments

Life at Sea Cruises’ first three-year sailing was announced in March and promised passengers willing to fork out at least $29,999 per year

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      491 year ago

      Idk man. You go hang out on a cruise for a bit you will find some old people who have made cruising their entire retirement plan. Basically just staying on boats going from port to port until they die.

      Which actually doesn’t sound all too bad. I’d think it’d get old after the first few weeks (I never heard Cupid Shuffle so many damn times in one week), but hey, whatever floats your boat.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      431 year ago

      It’s cheaper than a lot of retirement homes in America. Cruises outside of Caribbean voyages in peak season are like 90% retirees. It’s a more viable option for a lot of people. If this 3yr cruise was a lot cheaper per day, it would make a lot of sense for them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Plus if you tick that little box, you (your estate/ descendants) save on funeral fees with a ‘navy burial’ at sea. The cabin boy-things garb your corpse in whatever finest they discover in your wardrobe/suitcase and slip you off a Teflon-coated plank into the gentle deep and sharks.

        • @Ikelton
          link
          101 year ago

          Is this real? I know nothing about cruises, that seems so insane and yet so… Practical.

      • @AA5B
        link
        61 year ago

        The article said $29k/yr, and cruise prices generally include food. That’s cheaper than living most places

    • @SalamendaciousOP
      link
      161 year ago

      Not my idea of a good time either but it was appealing to some people. Cruises are incredibly popular. I’d only go if it were free and I was unable to sell the ticket(s).

      • Joelk111
        link
        11 year ago

        I don’t think I’d go if it were free. I have other things - productive things I could be doing.

      • Joelk111
        link
        -11 year ago

        I don’t think I’d go if it were free. I have other things - productive things I could be doing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -71 year ago

        But you’d still go? Like… if I bought you a ticket on a shitty cruise, you’d go just because you have to use up free things?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 year ago

          Who’s saying no to a free holiday? I went away this year for the first time in a decade and it was heavenly. I’d never chose to go on a cruise, but I’d jump at the chance for a new experience, some sun and relaxation - especially over winter when I having to chose between heating and eating ffs.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            01 year ago

            Who’s saying no to a free holiday?

            Me when it’s an obvious timeshare scam.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sounds like you take quite the beating. 😔

            Edit: I’m rhyming with heating and eating ffs

        • @SalamendaciousOP
          link
          61 year ago

          If you bought me a ticket on “Unkle Sal’s Discount Cruises” I would not go. If you bought me tickets for Carnival Cruises… Yeah I’d probably go.