• @interceder270
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, if we’re talking about ‘efficient ways to get calories’, then farming any animal is a stupid way to do that.

    You lose so much energy feeding them than if you just ate the food yourself or used the land to grow food.

    Always funny watching where meat-eaters draw the line with their abuse. There is more cognitive dissonance among ya’ll than conservatives.

    • @Fondots
      link
      English
      181 year ago

      The question posed was whether farming dogs is worse than farming other animals, and that is the question I attempted to answer.

      The question was not whether farming any animal for food is ethical or justifiable, and so I didn’t attempt to answer that.

    • @abstractastronaut
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      Just a small pointer: If the goal was to convince the person you replied to, the third condescending paragraph is a surefire way to make them not listen, which is a shame because the first two paragraphs are actually solid arguments.

      • @interceder270
        link
        English
        -171 year ago

        No, my goal was to say what I wanted to say and I accomplished that to a tee.

        Just a small pointer: nobody cares about your pointers. Lol.

          • @abstractastronaut
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            I wouldn’t spend any more energy on them. They made it clear that they’re here to talk at people rather than talking with people.