Curious on some replies here. I always hear having bees go extinct would be horrible for us. Curious if that’s the worse?

  • CoderKat
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    Oceanic plankton produces like half of the world’s oxygen. Trees get too much credit. I’m not sure what the exact impact of losing so much oxygen would be, but… Not good?

    • TheDeadGuy
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Plankton isn’t an animal or insect though, it’s algae and bacteria

      My vote goes to worms. Without them huge amounts (like the vast majority) of land will become dead after a few years. Worms are very underrated

      • MadCybertistOP
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        That’s an interesting take I don’t think anybody else has said worms yet

    • tal
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      You and I thrive in oxygen, because we evolved in its presence, but oxygen is a really potent corrosive chemical that destroys a lot of life. When blue-green algae first showed up and started dumping oxygen everywhere, it in turn was a cataclysmic event for life on Earth.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxidation_Event

      The Great Oxidation Event (GOE), also called the Great Oxygenation Event, the Oxygen Catastrophe, the Oxygen Revolution, the Oxygen Crisis, or the Oxygen Holocaust,[2] was a time interval during the Early Earth’s Paleoproterozoic era when the Earth’s atmosphere and the shallow ocean first experienced a rise in the concentration of oxygen.[3] This began approximately 2.460–2.426 Ga (billion years) ago, during the Siderian period, and ended approximately 2.060 Ga, during the Rhyacian.[4]

      The sudden injection of highly reactive free oxygen, which is toxic to the then-mostly anaerobic biosphere, may have caused the extinction of many existing organisms on Earth — then mostly archaeal colonies that used retinal to utilize green-spectrum light energy and power a form of anoxygenic photosynthesis (see Purple Earth hypothesis). Although the event is inferred to have constituted a mass extinction,[7] due in part to the great difficulty in surveying microscopic organisms’ abundances, and in part to the extreme age of fossil remains from that time, the Great Oxidation Event is typically not counted among conventional lists of “great extinctions”, which are implicitly limited to the Phanerozoic eon. In any case, Isotope geochemistry data from sulfate minerals have been interpreted to indicate a decrease in the size of the biosphere of >80% associated with changes in nutrient supplies at the end of the GOE.[8]

      Probably be pretty bad for us, but I suppose if you’re an obligate anaerobic organism, you’d be having the best situation since a couple of billion years ago.