• @AProfessional
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    XWayland doesn’t have a concept of fractional scaling. KDE just does some hacky things.

    • Quack Doc
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      It’s not really hacky as far as I know, it’s just the old status quo. On X applications could scale themselves if they have high DPI support, and that’s what KDE is allowing. And it works great. The vast majority of apps I use support high DPI on X, and they work perfectly fine on xwayland.

      It is legitimately a great experience using xwayland like this. A lot of apps I use, they look perfectly fine, they perform perfectly fine, and they’re not broken, which is a massive plus.

      Of course, this probably does break one or two apps out there. I’m not saying it’s a perfect solution. It’s far from it. But honestly, I think it’s a really good solution. It allows developers the ease and flexibility of developing for X11 if you don’t need Wayland’s features.

      Of course, you are still losing out. Having proper touch support is such an amazing feature with Wheland. Don’t get me wrong. I love a lot about Wheland. It’s just a pain in the ass to develop for. It is nowhere near as flexible as X11.

      • @AProfessional
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Setting the DPI is only a partial solution and plenty of assets and rendering will be incorrect. It is more crisp, especially for text, than the approach others take of upscaling though. It’s probably the approach I’d prefer personally.

        • Quack Doc
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Yep, I would say it’s the best we got. I have a 4K monitor at a 20% scale and it works great.