Two ballistic missiles were fired from Houthi rebel-controlled Yemen toward a US warship in the Gulf of Aden, after the US Navy responded to a distress call from a commercial tanker that had been seized by armed individuals, the US military said Sunday.

The tanker, identified as the Central Park, had been carrying a cargo of phosphoric acid when its crew called for help that “they were under attack from an unknown entity,” the US Central Command said in a statement.

The USS Mason, a guided-missile destroyer, and allied ships from a counter-piracy task force that operates in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia responded to the call for help and “demanded release of the vessel” upon arrival, Central Command said.

“Subsequently, five armed individuals debarked the ship and attempted to flee via their small boat,” said the statement posted on social media platform X.

  • @Madison420
    link
    English
    -41 year ago

    I didn’t lead anyone anywhere bud.

    That’s quite literally sensationalism. Instead of houthi missile it’s houti make ballistic missile so the uneducated go “wait they have ballistic missiles” and read a story that is a nothing burger. It’s like the seventh time they’ve been attacked loitering in the area.

    Nope, you’re judging it based on people that actually read like most of us in world News. The average person is not smart, and lacks critical thinking and judging by how many people don’t get it they number may be a bit higher than I assumed. Yes intent matters, that’s why they added ballistic lol.

    No need, but you probably aught to rethink some things yourself.

    • @schmidtster
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes… yes you did lead, your sensationalizing of the headline border on propaganda due to the bias you’ve presented….

      If they didn’t clarify ballistic, people would assume it was a much more sophisticated cruise missile. Sensationalism another way.

      Since the average person lacks critical thinking (like you here again) they would put ballistic missile to remove sensationalism and propaganda that can be built by bad actors (you again here), since now someone doesn’t need to do extra research or further reading to find, no they are safe since they aren’t intercontinental or smart cruise missiles.

      Thank god they told us they were dumb missiles.

      • @Madison420
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        You don’t see the problem with saying I’m sensationalizing something by pointing out sensationalism? Doesn’t make much sense does it?

        No they would assume it’s a missile, why do you assume it would mean cruise missile they’re not even the most common missile type direct fire guided are.

        Ballistic adds a reason to click, “wait houthis have ballistic missiles?” so they click and read. You still need to do extra research if you don’t know what a ballistic missile is, it’s never actually mentioned.

        Intermediate range missile is more accurate and less sensational.

        • @schmidtster
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Projectile is very cromulent non-sensationalizing term, let’s use that. Oh wait, they were relaying communication and it would be unethical for them to relay different information.

          Lots of avenues we could also go down, just give it up.

          • @Madison420
            link
            English
            -11 year ago

            If you want to be tedious an arrow is technically a ballistic missile by some definitions, do you think they shot an arrow at a destroyer?

            • @schmidtster
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Which is why it’s important to say ballistic missile! Thank you!

              • @Madison420
                link
                English
                -11 year ago

                Not at all, your argument makes no sense.

                • @schmidtster
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Sensationalism applies to removed words too, I’m sorry you can’t seem to comprehend this. Goodbye

                  • @Madison420
                    link
                    English
                    -11 year ago

                    That it does, if omission made it more sensational, removing “ballistic” makes it less sensational.

                    Have a nice night as well bud.