• @xkforce
    link
    166
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The party of “patriotism” everyone. This is their guy… the same guy whose defense for trying to overthrow the government and install himself as dictator is “I never said I swore an oath to uphold the constitution”

    • Blackbeard
      link
      English
      511 year ago

      Not just that, but the ones for whom the freedoms enshrined in the Constitution are the beginning, middle, and end of their entire personal identity. They have a section of the Constitution tatooed on their fucking bodies, and they still support a man who would just as soon use the damned thing as toilet paper.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        If Trump can argue the technicality that he never specifically said “support”, we can argue ths technicality that the 2nd doesn’t specifically say “guns”.

        • TechyDad
          link
          141 year ago

          It says the right to “bear arms.” So if I want to graft a pair of cybernetically enhanced black bear arms to my body, I should have the right to do so! (As part of a well organized Bear Arm Militia, of course.)

        • @Cocodapuf
          link
          11 year ago

          “So really it’s just the right to have bare arms, sleeveless shirts are A-OK!”

      • @TurboDiesel
        link
        English
        101 year ago

        Anyone who makes one thingTM their entire raison d’etre is always a little… let’s go with off for politeness. But the 2nd Amendment ones are just walking red flags.

      • @kometes
        link
        English
        91 year ago

        Can penis size be negative?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The Second Amendment is so awkwardly worded. You can tell it was initially drafted, then the middle part of the sentence (third line on that guy’s back) added in later.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      The us right wing is entirely the “there must be outgroups to bind and in groups to protect” mindset. Everything else is after the fact justification.