@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoRed Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changeswww.redhat.comexternal-linkmessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1173arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1171arrow-down1external-linkRed Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changeswww.redhat.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square93fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@reddit_suxlinkEnglish7•1 year ago Stable is freaking old and unstable. I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.
minus-squareGilbertolinkEnglish3•1 year agoI think he meant: Stable is freaking old. Unstable has a lot of limitations.
minus-square@warmasterlinkEnglish2•1 year agoIndeed, I edited my comment to better convey my point. Thanks for being so good at reading comprehension.
minus-square@ghariksforgelinkEnglish1•1 year agoIt’s more stable to be on the latest versions than to carry around bugs and issues that were solved 5 years ago.
minus-square@warmasterlinkEnglish1•1 year agoMy bad. I meant the Stable branch is old, which is good for lots of use cases, but not mine. And the Unstable branch which Docker for example, doesn’t support. I edited my original comment to better represent what I’m trying to say.
minus-squareSir AramislinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoPretty sure the whole statement is Stable is freaking old, and unstable has lots of limitations I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.
minus-square@warmasterlinkEnglish2•1 year agoExactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoA lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.
I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.
I think he meant: Stable is freaking old. Unstable has a lot of limitations.
Indeed, I edited my comment to better convey my point. Thanks for being so good at reading comprehension.
It’s more stable to be on the latest versions than to carry around bugs and issues that were solved 5 years ago.
My bad. I meant the Stable branch is old, which is good for lots of use cases, but not mine. And the Unstable branch which Docker for example, doesn’t support. I edited my original comment to better represent what I’m trying to say.
Pretty sure the whole statement is
I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.
Exactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.
A lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.