Some mix of wrong and right, the exact proportions of which I’ll leave as an exercise to the reader.

  • @reddit_sux
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    Stable is freaking old and unstable.

    I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.

    • Gilberto
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      I think he meant: Stable is freaking old. Unstable has a lot of limitations.

      • @warmaster
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Indeed, I edited my comment to better convey my point. Thanks for being so good at reading comprehension.

    • @ghariksforge
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s more stable to be on the latest versions than to carry around bugs and issues that were solved 5 years ago.

    • @warmaster
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      My bad. I meant the Stable branch is old, which is good for lots of use cases, but not mine. And the Unstable branch which Docker for example, doesn’t support. I edited my original comment to better represent what I’m trying to say.

    • Sir Aramis
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure the whole statement is

      Stable is freaking old, and unstable has lots of limitations

      I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.

      • @warmaster
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Exactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      A lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.