• @utopianfiat
    link
    English
    1111 months ago

    No clue why there’s hate for them

    • Flying Squid
      link
      3111 months ago

      They did some pretty shitty things when they were owned by Gawker (they actually showed a photo of a rape once) and a lot of people weren’t even aware they changed ownership when Gawker got sued into oblivion. More recently, they spent way, way too much time on celebrity trash reporting, but their reporting on abortion topics was solid if you were willing to wade through the shit. My hope is for much less shit and more of that reporting.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1211 months ago

        Oh wow, I didn’t know about the rape article, the worst I knew from that era was the article defending domestic violence against men (which is still online without retraction). Gawker Media really was a toxic cesspool.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          611 months ago

          Definitely. I’m very glad they’re gone, although it’s bullshit that Peter Thiel funded the lawsuit against him after they outed him. Don’t get me wrong, they totally deserved it for what they did with Hulk Hogan (who is also a piece of shit), but I am guessing Gawker would have survived if Thiel hadn’t hired the best lawyers his fortune could buy. It just shows how uneven the justice system is.

          • @thrawn
            link
            311 months ago

            I actually see that case as the other side of that same coin. It’s been a long time but I vaguely recall Gawker featuring other unethical/likely illegal content like that. They were a large company with a legal team though, so they were difficult to challenge.

            That it required someone of that ghoul Thiel’s resources to take them to court demonstrates an unevenness in itself. It’s wildly expensive to sue a large company even if they’re legally in the wrong, granting them a built in protection against claims.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2011 months ago

      They had some pretty heavy biased reporting. It was a feminist news source, but their version of feminism was pretty toxic. If you weren’t their version of woman (not necessarily in the Trans sense), you were fair game and they attacked you while supporting other women doing very similar things.

      Ultimately they probably caused more harm than good with their articles.

      • @QuarterSwede
        link
        211 months ago

        Definitely. It’s a trash rag and I was glad they were being put to pasture. Oh well.

      • @utopianfiat
        link
        English
        -511 months ago

        I mean to be fair feminism doesn’t mean “treat every woman with kid gloves”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1011 months ago

          But it does mean you shouldn’t slut shame woman A for being in playboy and tell woman B to slut it up.

          • @utopianfiat
            link
            English
            011 months ago

            I have no idea what you’re talking about so it doesn’t really make sense to accuse me of defending that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              If you’re unsure what they’re saying, maybe you should ask first before justifying your opinion.

              • @utopianfiat
                link
                English
                111 months ago

                That’s exactly what I’m doing

                What the fuck is this

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              I’m talking about what jezebel did, it wasn’t treating women with kid gloves, it was treating similar acts of women completely differently because one wasn’t their ideal woman.

              • @utopianfiat
                link
                English
                111 months ago

                What are you talking about specifically?