• @prime_number_314159
    link
    41 year ago

    Not true at all. A vagina looks way different when you’re having vaginal sex.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      True enough, it’ll definitely be distended and have signs of visible arousal during the moments that someone is having vaginal intercourse. No long-term changes after arousal does down, tho.

      • @SirQuackTheDuck
        link
        61 year ago

        after arousal dies down

        What is this mythical post-arousal phase you’re talking about. I’m horny 24/7.

    • @cosmicrookie
      link
      111 year ago

      Correct but only during sex. Returns to normal after use. Not like this picture suggest that the more sex you have the more of an outie you get

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -81 year ago

        Not only that, but every 7 year all your cells in your body are replaced.

        So if you don’t have sex for 7 years, you are back to being a virgin.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          Ah yes, obviously this is true. I’ve had to circumcise myself every 7 years as a result. Fortunately foreskins are useful for witchcraft, so it’s kind of like a side hustle.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s actually not true, there are quite a lot of cells in our bodies which are never replaced such as the lenses, cones, and rods in our eyes, egg cells, neurons, the hairs that detect sound in our ears, our heart muscles, among many others. The ones that do get replaced vary greatly in how long that takes or how often it happens.

      • @Madison420
        link
        61 year ago

        They’re saying during sex which yes there are physical changes to the presentation that occur when aroused. Not this bullshit sandwich effect for sure but still, they’re not wrong it’s just a really weird point.

        • @knightry
          link
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The person you’re replying to is named Send me photos. I think they were just trying to get some noods.

          edit: typo

          • @Madison420
            link
            31 year ago

            I see that, but I responded because the person above sendmephotos was negative and it kinda bothered me.