• @Poem_for_your_sprog
    link
    English
    610 months ago

    Until the cause of this one is determined, the only V-22 crash that wasn’t pilot error was due to a maintenance error where a mechanic wired the controls backwards.

    • @deranger
      link
      English
      1110 months ago

      Pilot error is rarely the actual cause, but is a convenient scapegoat. I worked in rotary accident investigation in the Army and that’s not something you’ll read in a report. There’s other issues; why is this aircraft in particular so prone to pilot error? Perhaps it’s poorly designed?

      • @Poem_for_your_sprog
        link
        English
        510 months ago

        It’s because it’s a heavy rotorcraft. Not poor design, just rotorcraft physics. It’s prone to enter a vortex ring state if the descent rate in relation to forward velocity is too high. The same thing can happen with any normal helicopter, but the V-22 has a lot of weight for the disk area of it’s rotors, giving stronger vortices from the rotors.

        It’s a pilot training thing, but I think they did put some sort of alert system on it if it’s getting close to the conditions that induce VRS.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_ring_state

        https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/2022/06/28/ntsb-jim-clayton-fault-fatal-tennessee-river-helicopter-crash/7760608001/

        https://verticalmag.com/news/ntsb-report-virginia-state-police-helicopter-crash/

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_mwUCiiEHos

        • @deranger
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s because it’s a heavy rotorcraft. Not poor design, just rotorcraft physics.

          Like I said, poor design. Wrong tool for the job.

          It can’t travel slow enough for blackhawks nor fast enough for fixed wing. The V-22 is an absolute turd.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            410 months ago

            I thought they were designed for things like marine search and rescue, where speed is important and the ability to hover is essential.

            • @Poem_for_your_sprog
              link
              English
              410 months ago

              They’re great at this, but the pilot needs to stay within the operating envelope, same as any helicopter.

              All rotorcraft are dangerous compared to any fixed wing aircraft. It’s a lot less forgiving on pilots and maintenance crews.

            • @deranger
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Well, they’re not fast (prop too big) nor are they particularly great at hovering (rotor too small).

              It’s the worst of both worlds.

                • @deranger
                  link
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  Yes, but slower and less range than fixed wing. Likewise, it can’t do rotary wing things as good as a helicopter. It’s truly a “master of none” aircraft. It’s not great at anything.

                  Putting it in a rescue role is a terrible idea. You do not want a finicky to fly, unreliable aircraft in that scenario.

          • @Poem_for_your_sprog
            link
            English
            210 months ago

            Read all the links, it’s nothing unique to the V-22. All rotorcraft suffer from the same condition.

            Pilots just have to be careful while descending with low forward velocity.

            • @deranger
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I repeat - tiny heavily loaded rotors are the wrong tool for the job thus making it a bad design

    • Redex
      link
      English
      310 months ago

      Interesting, I heard it had a very bad reputation for it’s reliability, but I guess it’s just that it’s extremely hard to control then.