Elon Musk, the owner of X, criticized advertisers with expletives on Wednesday at The New York Times’s DealBook Summit.

  • @SCB
    link
    131 year ago

    Can you explain what you mean using other words? I am not great with loose language in general.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -111 year ago

      By stating that, it was a component of the government. In that context I was using component loosely.

      • @SCB
        link
        91 year ago

        I’m aware of that. What was the thing you intended?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -51 year ago

          All governments have an economic system and each economic system is dependent on some level of government involvement.

          • @SCB
            link
            81 year ago

            Yes but those economic systems aren’t part of the gov, the gov is part of the economic system

            Bullets are fired by a gun but are not part of a gun

              • @SCB
                link
                71 year ago

                Yes that is my point.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -71 year ago

                  ??? The spring mechanism is apart of how a gun functions but the spring isn’t the gun it’s just a part of it. That’s no different from the bullet. We’ve gotten completely sidetracked of the main point.

                  • @SCB
                    link
                    7
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You’re just not following the my metaphor. Perhaps it was a bad metaphor on my part. Let me try without it. This will be a bit long.

                    The economic system does not affect the government. The government effects the economic system.

                    Capitalism is an economic system. The government can then choose many different ways to approach capitalism.

                    It can be state-run authoritarian capitalism as is the case with China in their designated trade zones.

                    It can be totally laissez-faire, as in Randian fiction (or my favorite take on it, the book Futuristic Violence and Fancy Suits), allowing the market to dictate all growth

                    It generally is somewhere in between, with the state sometimes intervening in more or less extreme ways but generally just policing the system for health and safety reasons.

                    Capitalism, however, is not inherent to the government’s operations. A capitalist economy can change into a socialist economy, or a mercantile economy, and the government not change. The UK went from mercantilism to capitalism without a significant change in their governance, as a very notable example.