Sen. Cruz Introduces Bill Blocking the Federal Government from Compelling Pronoun Use that Contradicts Biology | U.S. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas
www.cruz.senate.gov
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and...

Links to a republican’s own website is the definition of the allowed content of this community.

  • PizzaMan
    2•1 year ago

    Or do we just follow the Constitution and allow free speech?

    You have a choice, so it does not conflict with free speech.

    I get you that Democrats love to be fascist

    This is projection. Trump has literally called his political opponents vermin, which is something Hitler loved to do.

    but free speech is important to conservatives

    Yeah, that’s why this sub’s owner decided to try banning the word fascist & Nazi a few weeks back. You are either lying or incredibly misinformed.

      • PizzaMan
        1•1 year ago

        Not if the government is imposing it on you. Not sure if you’ve ever read caselaw but if the

        Oh no! The government is imposing rules requiring basic respect for co-workers on government employees! The horror!

        Why are you talking about Trump? Trump has nothing to do with the conversation.

        Trump is a fascist. He basically quotes Hitler. He is supported by neo nazis and KKK members. He has made countless racist statements about immigrants.

        You keep saying the democrats are the fascists meanwhile the republican leader is the biggest fascist around.

        Free speech is limited by the nature of the rules of lemm.ee. Since we are guests we must respect those rules.

        You’re almost there.

          • PizzaMan
            0•1 year ago

            So you don’t care what the constitution says? It’s just some old piece of paper to you?

            Yet another example of how you like to be misleading. Nothing I said even slightly implied that.

            Lemm.ee is not the US government and isn’t even based in America.

            Sure is. But this is irrelevant.

              • PizzaMan
                0•1 year ago

                You said people should be punished for expressing their 1st amendment rights. That they should be terminated as government workers for using their 1st amendment.

                That is not what I said. If you can’t even accurately represent what I am saying, then you have no room to complain about who is posting in good faith.

                  • PizzaMan
                    2•1 year ago

                    either comply or be fired.

                    This

                    people should be punished for expressing their 1st amendment rights.

                    And this are not equivalent. Basic respect for peers as a requirement for employment is not a violation of your first amendment rights.