• NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -61 year ago

    Sorry, are you talking about a different article? Or different people?

    Maybe you could quote something from the article which supports your point… you know, like I did.

      • NaibofTabr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “completely” is a quantifier.

        You still haven’t supported your point from the original source. I have. I am not the one struggling with reading comprehension.

          • NaibofTabr
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What is your point? Do you think this page contains an exhaustive list of quantifiers? “Completely” is a quantifier.

            And… you still haven’t supported your point from the original source.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              “Completely” is a quantifier.

              A quantifier of intensity not a quantifier of quantity. This is really not that hard.

              you still haven’t supported your point from the original source

              See, this is not how these things work. You’re the one who made a claim about the content of this article. I showed you you’re wrong. That is my point. End of story.

              • NaibofTabr
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -31 year ago

                You’re the one who made a claim about the content of this article.

                I didn’t ‘make a claim about the content of this article’ … I quoted content directly from this article.

                I showed you you’re wrong.

                No, you haven’t. You’ve given your opinion, which is different from what is proposed in the article. Which is fine, the proposal in the article is poorly thought out and anyone reasonable should have a different opinion… which is my point.