• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    “Lawyers for the family suggested that the flight attendant removed the phone and erased images of the girl before letting her father see his iPhone photos.”

    There’s another spot as well mentioning the father taking the phone from him, but some crap ad is keeping the text covered up. So yes. It says the guy got the phone back and then the dad demanded to see his pictures on his phone.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      -31 year ago

      So a theory.

      Lawyers presented a theory for why no images were found, and you take that as evidence?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Jesus christ, man. The article literally says he made the Steward show the pictures on his phone. Did you fail reading comprehension back in grade school?

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lawyers for the family suggested that the flight attendant removed the phone and erased images of the girl before letting her father see his iPhone photos.

          That does not say the phone was most definitely his in any way, shape, or form.

          For all you know the father demanded to look at his phone, he let him, the father found nothing and claimed he must’ve taken the phone back and deleted the photos. That does not prove fucking shit, it’s one sides story that is so far not backed up by any evidence.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            You wanted the quote from the article. I gave you the quote from the article. Don’t go claiming “well the article might not be true” yadda yadda yadda. Don’t go changing the argument to something else after I showed you that you were wrong, dumbass.

            • Deceptichum
              link
              fedilink
              -11 year ago

              No, you gave me a quote that doesn’t back-up your claim.

              If you read the article, it seems the phone was most definitely the flight attendants.

              If you read the article, the only link between the phone in the seat and the one in the attendants position is the suggestion of a third party lawyer.

              No where is a definitive claim laid out that they are the same phone.

              Is it so hard for you people to stop trying to ruin innocent people’s lives with your witch hunt?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                The guys phone was taped to the seat, thats not even being questioned

                The only thing in question is if there were photos on the phone that was taped to the seat, a phone which he said belongs to him.

                • Deceptichum
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Who do you expect to question it?

                  Who else has the journalist spoken to other than comments from the family’s lawyer?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    The guy being accused.

                    If it wasnt his phone, he would immediately clear himself by saying “hey boss, my phone is right here in my hand, the kid is lying about that being my phone, mine was never in that bathroom.”

                    The phone was, as reported by the FBI, given back to the man being accused before they asked him to let them look at the photo gallery.

                    If it wasnt his phone, they wouldnt have given it to him in the first place. Very easy way to clear his name, when the girl accused him on the plane.