• @Treczoks
    link
    English
    -31 year ago

    I wonder how he thinks how supermarket shelves or the storage of his favorite restaurants are filled. He might be in for a surprise when no trucks will be delivering anything in the city. Or does he believe his local Tesco is getting it’s wares by tube?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      It’s not clear from the way the article quotes him exactly what he said should be “ripped out completely”. You seem to be interpreting it as “all city roads should be ripped out completely”.

      I suspect he’s saying we could rip out many city roads, completely turning them into green spaces and with forms of more active transport. I don’t think this is saying remove all roads to the extent goods vehicles can’t enter.

    • @nodsocket
      link
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @Treczoks
        link
        English
        -21 year ago

        So we simply dissolve cities instead? Without inflow of goods, workers, and customers cities are not able to survive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Goods:

          Rail, tram, cargo bikes interconnected at re-implemented logistic centres.

          Workers:

          Public transport, (electric) bicycles

          Customers:

          Retail will change, but cities will not lose their function of overspecialisation.

          • @Treczoks
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Nice fantasy. Nobody will pay for the first, the second will be a complete illusion with the current state of public transport (and how you want to get people with 30+ km commute one way to bike, even electric, will remain an unsolved riddle). The only thing with the third is, you are right, it will change, I.e. it will kill off in-city retail completely.