Uh, yeah, we established that a couple of comments ago. My point is that if people today still develop for 50-year-old hardware, it’s not unreasonable to think that they could be developing for 17 year old hardware.
Frankly, I’m already bored with this conversation. Have a nice evening.
Who said only internet-facing assets need to be patched?
Who said it was connected to a network?
What would be the point of a router not connected to any network?
I dunno. Development? Ask OP.
This comment thread is about an unpatched router (probably in production) at a Canadian Internet exchange
What’s an internet exchange in this context? I thought it meant an online forum.
Probably a co-lo where different carriers peer.
Got it. Thanks for explaining.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_exchange_point
Developing for a 17 year old router
Bro. There are people who are developing in Cobol for 50 year old systems.
There are games still being released for the original, 80s-era Nintendo.
So… yeah. Unlikely? Sure. Impossible? Nope.
It’s not running on 50 year old hardware I can guarantee you that
Uh, yeah, we established that a couple of comments ago. My point is that if people today still develop for 50-year-old hardware, it’s not unreasonable to think that they could be developing for 17 year old hardware.
Frankly, I’m already bored with this conversation. Have a nice evening.