• @big_slap
    link
    96 months ago

    did you read the article? the draft was voted on by a committee, so it had to be read by other people. honestly, work like this is perfect for LLMs like chatGPT. what is concerning about this for you?

    • tygerprints
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      If it isn’t concerning to you, god help you. You’ll find out soon enough why it should be.

      • @big_slap
        link
        06 months ago

        why should it concern me? I don’t understand the danger.

        • tygerprints
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          Maybe I’m reading too much into it, but it’s the “secretly written” by ChatGPT that bothers me. Not the fact that ChatGPT can conceive of something and write it out. I’m not completely against AI, I realize we use it with Siri and Alexis and other apps all the time. Just the idea that a program can create something which APPEARS to be from a legitimate human actor and really isn’t at all - and can even get it passed into law. That’s the part that is frightening, in my opinion.

          • @big_slap
            link
            16 months ago

            fair point to make, and I mostly agree.

            • tygerprints
              link
              fedilink
              26 months ago

              Well AI is here to stay either way, it’s just going to get more prevalent.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Because life requires actual human participation and you can’t be a lazy asshole who lets AI, or anything else for that matter, do the living for you.

          • tygerprints
            link
            fedilink
            36 months ago

            Here here. I agree with that also. However I’m starting to see a future where AI does pretty much everything for us and we turn into those fat blobs who just float around all day (what movie was that? With the robot E.T. looking dude?).

          • @big_slap
            link
            0
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I agree, but this is work for language written in law. how does what you say tie into this scenario?

            side note, I think everyone who believes what happened here is not good has never collaborated on writing a large document before.

                  • @big_slap
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    what does that even mean

                    edit: checked your profile to see if I was replying to a child or an adult. all I had to do was see the words eat the rich in bold to realize that im actually replying to a psychopath lmao.