• @Ensign_Crab
    link
    English
    91 year ago

    Netanyahu has made it clear that he intends to pursue attacks against Gaza until Hamas is wiped out.

    If Hamas cannot be wiped out by attacking Gaza, the condition for ending the war cannot be met, even if Gaza is reduced to a plain of uninhabited slag.

    • @muntedcrocodile
      link
      11 year ago

      The purpose of the war in gaza is to get revenge. Its just 2 nations trying to genocide eachother hamas doesnt care about war crimes or the world order israil has to at least pretend to play ball to keep the americans on side.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are always alternatives. They could call Hamas combat ineffective and declare truece. Tough to do, though as Hamas is still firing rockets on Isreal.

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        They could call Hamas combat ineffective and declare truece.

        Wiping out Hamas is the current stated goal, not rendering them ineffective. You don’t set a condition you can’t meet if your intention is to stop at some point.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          It all depends on your definition of wiping out. I’m sure your not going to get every single one. BTW, Saudi, Jordan and Egypt really want them to wipe them all out. They consider Hamas another Muslim Brotherhood, and don’t give a shit about the Gazians.

          • @Ensign_Crab
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            It all depends on your definition of wiping out.

            Do you suppose Netanyahu will be content with leaving Hamas’ leadership intact?

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              -31 year ago

              I think Netanyahu will be content to stay out of jail. He might not get to make that call.

              Israel has got, between regular and reserve, about half million troops in the field. It’s GDP isn’t good enough to carry the cost for that for too long. It may be less of a decision than you might think.

              • @Ensign_Crab
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                It’s GDP isn’t good enough to carry the cost for that for too long.

                Ours may be.

                  • @Ensign_Crab
                    link
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    It would be, but that will never happen

                    You sure? Let’s examine domestic politics regarding the war:

                    Republicans are in favor of the “plain of uninhabited slag” outcome for its own sake.

                    Progressives want the war to end, preferably quickly.

                    And centrist Democrats have a few reasons to side with Republicans on this: It doesn’t involve altering the status quo. They get to be seen as bipartisan by doing something Republicans want. And they have a GWB-style “terrorist sympathizer” cudgel to deploy against progressives.

                    Way I see it, Netanyahu will have us doing whatever he wants until the cudgel stops working at the earliest, since he can count on having both Republicans and centrist Dems in his corner.