@Custoslibera to [email protected] • 1 year agoThey aren't, and I'm sick of being told they areimagemessage-square193arrow-up11.45Karrow-down1134
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageThey aren't, and I'm sick of being told they are@Custoslibera to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square193
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•edit-21 year agoCorruption is the issue when governments are involved with capital. Social inequality is the issue when private owners control the capital. My view is that having an army and control over the capital is too many eggs in the same basket.
minus-square@NAXLABlink7•1 year agoSo… Without a government, there just wouldn’t be armies? Rich and powerful private citizens wouldn’t form their own armed forces?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoWhy wouldn’t there be warlords? I’m not sure how this comment follows. Without a government, you get both eggs in one basket, which the original commenter agrees is bad.
Corruption is the issue when governments are involved with capital. Social inequality is the issue when private owners control the capital.
My view is that having an army and control over the capital is too many eggs in the same basket.
So… Without a government, there just wouldn’t be armies? Rich and powerful private citizens wouldn’t form their own armed forces?
Why wouldn’t there be warlords? I’m not sure how this comment follows. Without a government, you get both eggs in one basket, which the original commenter agrees is bad.
East India company would like to speak to him