• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -21 year ago

    Any terms of service agreement. When legally challenged, they usually do not hold up in court.

    Playstation makes you sign one that says you dont get to own the games you pay for and they can take them away whenever. A judge would likely tell them thats illegal, and they have to render services paid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      There is a reason the “you behave like an ass, you lose access” part is not usually the one anyone challenges in court.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Lol, or I trust you can type things like “terms of service legal standing” into a search bar, and have better things to do than research something I already know for a stranger who wont read anything I find for them.

            Look through my comments. The last dipshit who played this game ghosted me after I found them 4 sources. Guaranteed, they did not read them.

            If you actually care? You can find the info. We both know you didnt care what I brought you, tho, which is why youre pretending a knock off reddit forum needs citations to be correct.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I googled it and looks like you were wrong.

              Edit: also lol at “This isn’t reddit, I can spout whatever crap I want without backing it up”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                “the law doesnt support this when push comes to shove, judges do not side with it”

                “Source?”

                “If you care you can find it yourself, this is a comment section”

                “RRRREEEEEEEEEEEEE”

                Lol ok bud

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Hey look, another comment with nothing even close to a defense.

                  Let’s replay this to see why what you’re saying is such obvious bullshit, shall we?

                  First you claimed that one has a “fundamental right” to access digital content they’ve “purchased” (licensed conditionally). There is no such fundamental right. You’re flat-out wrong there. Go ahead, Google it.

                  But let’s give you a little wiggle room and assume you just didn’t know what a fundamental right is. What you’re saying is that if you violate the terms of service by engaging in cheating, harassment, or sexual harassment, and the platform bans you, thereby removing your access to that content, a judge would rule against the platform and have them reinstate your access in almost every case.

                  First of all, the shift from “fundamental right” to “often” and “usually” is a pretty transparent move on your part. But that aside, you’re still just talking out of your ass. Of course there are cases where terms and conditions have been deemed to be unenforceable. But certainly not “most of the time” and definitely not in cases of obvious malicious activity.

                  Cute little reply though.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    Its not a defense because this isnt a debate? Im not the judge, and you arent either. I dont care what you believe, because your belief doesnt change the law.

                    If you care, you can google it bud. You dont need me to find this for you.

                    But you clearly dont care about facts, you want to play gotcha. Poorly, but youre obviously only trying to make this a debate you can win.

                    Its not a debate, honey. Its sad you think it is.