@ernest how do I report a Magazin on kbin.social ? There is a usere called “ps” who is posting to his own “antiwoke” Magazin on kbin.social. Please remove this and dont give them a chance to etablish them self on kbin.social. When I report his stuff it will go to him because he is the moderator of the magazin? Seems like a problem. Screenshot of the “antiwoke” Magazin /sub on kbin.social. 4 Headlines are visible, 2 exampels: “Time to reject the extrem trans lobby harming our society” “How to end wokeness” #Moderation #kbin #kbin.social 📎

edit: dont feed the troll, im shure ernest will delet them all when he sees this. report and move on.

Edit 2 : Ernest responded:
“I just need a little more time. There will likely be a technical break announced tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Along with the migration to new servers, we will be introducing new moderation tools that I am currently working on and testing (I had it planned for a bit later in my roadmap). Then, I will address your reports and handle them very seriously. I try my best to delete sensitive content, but with the current workload and ongoing relocation, it takes a lot of time. I am being extra cautious now. The regulations are quite general, and I would like to refine them together with you and do everything properly. For now, please make use of the option to block the magazine/author.”

  • stillnotahero
    link
    fedilink
    601 year ago

    The far-right brings messages of hate, violence, intolerance, and attempts to pass legislation to justify their views. The far-left has brought us the weekend, the 40 hour work week, child labor laws, etc…

    • Aesthesiaphilia
      link
      fedilink
      281 year ago

      Not to mention the insidious evil of clean drinking water and food that won’t poison you.

    • jonion
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the far-right

      who?

      messages of hate, violence

      such as?

      intolerance

      the tu quoque is almost too tempting here

      pass legislation to justify their views

      this is a joke, right?

      Oh, and I didn’t know people like Henry Ford and the 2nd Baron Trent were “far-left”. I guess the horseshoe really does exist after all.
      Stop beating strawmen, your ideological muscles are only gonna atrophy further.

        • Alstjbin
          link
          fedilink
          251 year ago

          The apparent paradox is solved by viewing tolerance as a social contract. Only those who adhere to the contract and are tolerant of others can have a claim to receive that same tolerance. Similarly those who are intolerant should have no expectation to be tolerated since they do not adhere to the social contract which should provide that tolerance.

        • jonion
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Nonsense, we most certainly can. In fact, most countries “worked out” without ever needing to be tolerant in the first place.

          Popper doesn’t even acknowledge that this notion can be universalized, and then you’re just back to square one with Carl Schmitt and the Concept of the Political.

          Take your LGBT example. For that to work, you must be intolerant of, say, Salafis. Then the Salafi can respond that his in-group (the faithful, true to God, whatever) are being threatened by those who must necessarily be intolerant of him by nature of their own allegiance.

          Thus you still end up with a value judgment despite Popper’s veneer of neutralization and depoliticization. That’s where the real philosophizing begins. How do you justify allegiance to one side of the friend/enemy distinction over the other?

          • curiosityLynx
            link
            fedilink
            13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Except you don’t have to be intolerant of Salafis. They can be Salafis or not for all I or anyone else cares, what matters is whether they hate people for who they are and spread or communicate that hate.

            I’m personally not entirely sure about male to female trans athletes being allowed to compete in female-only leagues and am concerned about the wisdom of allowing sex change procedures for minors that weren’t born intersex. I wouldn’t marry a trans person and if a close family member suddenly came out as trans I might have long discussions with said family member for a while,

            But that’s it. I wouldn’t even dream of hating someone for being trans or demonizing people who are. Even if I had religious beliefs against that kind of stuff it would at worst make me worry about such a person or make me pray for them.

            If I were a moderator of a public space, I’d allow them to talk there without fear so long as they’re not actively attacking others, same as any other group.

            Likewise, you can believe that trans people are wrong and will go to whatever equivalent of hell your belief system has and I would tolerate you as long as you are civil about it, come from a position of compassion and empathy and don’t try to force people to listen to you (like by using multiple accounts to circumvent blocks and/or bans) who have clearly communicated that they don’t want to hear you anymore (same goes in the other direction, btw) and don’t try to incite others to treat them as anything other than fellow human beings.

            If someone from either side can’t do that, that person lacks tolerance and in turn can expect the same level of tolerance being directed to them.

            • jonion
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Salafism kind of requires you to be intolerant of people for who they are, but let’s not pretend these people would lend the same “live and let live” thinking to a Catholic bishop who espoused the views of a Salafi mullah when it comes to homosexuals.

              But I get where you’re coming from and your position is entirely reasonable. The problem is just that your attitude is not that of this thread and the OP. If you actually look at this 10A guy’s posts you’ll find nothing that merits the response you see in this thread. I’d say there’s a long way to overstepping the threshold of civility on that part, but in this thread people already want heads on spikes, so to speak.

      • stillnotahero
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Alright you caught me in a good mood, so I’ll throw some articles out here to explain my line of thinking. I hope you’ll see I’m not arguing with strawmen.

        Article from October of last year describing right wing outrage to drag shows.

        Fast forward to recent months and it appears that words have turned to action, in the form of legislation

        I believe some else mentioned the Paradox of Tolerance, but I will link it again just in case you missed it.

        I hope this clears up my line of thinking. No invisible boogymen here - just some examples of,
        In my opinion, things changing for the worst. And if you were not arguing in good faith… oh well.

        • jonion
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah I get where you’re coming from but this all hinges on the concept of Popper’s Open Society taken to its most extreme.
          Have you ever considered why this whole “children must be able to see drag shows” notion didn’t show up just 20 years ago?

          Idk, this kind of devil-on-the-wall “this is trans GENOCIDE” rhetoric when it comes to shit like increasing penalties for indecent exposure and not allowing children to attend drag shows really just says the quiet part out loud.

          • @RaoulDook
            link
            11 year ago

            Why don’t you go ahead and point out anyone who is stating the opinion that “children must be able to see drag shows” for us?

            To me, that sounds a lot like a made-up position designed to enrage the orange man cult.

            I think what most tolerant people want is for those who wish to hold or attend drag shows to be left alone with their own choices. Some people want to attend those, and I’m not sure why, but it’s not my place to tell them they can’t. That’s the general position of tolerance in regard to this subject IMO.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          The “Paradox of Tolerance” is garbage. An interesting thought experiment where Popper came to the wrong conclusions. You can’t believe in “Freedom of Speech” AND “The Paradox of Tolerance”. They’re incompatible.

          https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/toleration/

          I’ll take “freedom of speech” over “governmental censorship” any day.

          Because nobody thinks about what happens if a fundie takes power and decides that abortion is “intolerable” and arrests people who make pro-choice arguments because they’re being offensive. Or if anyone makes fun of religion, that’s intolerance and you must go to jail.

          TLDR: Fuck “The Paradox of Tolerance”. It’s dumb.