• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Well, I only wrote simple exercises in Intel assembly in uni, but there were more of those with AVR assembly.

    You can structure things nicely and understandably if you want.

    It’s an acquired skill just like many others. Just today writing something big fully in assembly is not in demand, so that skill can usually be encountered among embedded engineers or something like that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Is there a tutorial you could recommend? I’m actually pretty curious how exactly you would go about that now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sorry, I don’t remember what I used then as a tutorial, possibly nothing, and I don’t write assembly often, it was just an opinion based on the experience from the beginning of my comment. That said:

        You have call and return, so you can use procedures with return. You have compare and conditional jump instructions. And you have timers and interrupts for scheduling. That allows for basic structure.

        You split your program functionally into many files (say, one per procedure) and include those. That allows for basic complexity management.

        To use OS syscalls you need to look for the relevant OS ABI reference, but it’s not hard.

        So all the usual. Similar to the dumber way of using C.

        In general writing (EDIT: whole programs, it’s used all the time in codecs and other DSP, at the very least) in assembly languages is unpopular not because it’s hard, but because it’s very slow.