I’m afraid I have to disagree with Elon on this. We have way too many people on this planet. It think it’s unethical to have many children when we are stressing our resources.

  • NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    -41 year ago

    If you don’t like “anti-billionare rants” don’t bringing up billionaires doing shit clearly for the purpose of getting more money.

    The topic is children. Yet, you talk about billionaires. Nothing to do with the topic.

    It’s case law, and you probably wouldn’t listen anyways, given how your dismissing me out of hand on the other stuff.

    No, it isn’t. Cite it.

    • PizzaMan
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      The topic is children. Yet, you talk about billionaires. Nothing to do with the topic.

      Crazy, I must have hallucinated Musk being in the literal title of the post you made, and in the body of the post you made, and the 6 mentions of him in the article you linked.

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -41 year ago

        Yet his money isn’t the issue. The issue is dinks and children. I get you’re jealous of Elon and his fortune but it’s irrelevant to the discussion.

        • PizzaMan
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Saying somebody is just jealous of somebody because they are criticizing them is profoundly illogical.

          Try again next time without the ad hominems.

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -31 year ago

            That isn’t an ad hominem. You’re jealous of Elon or have a crush on him. Not sure which. Otherwise you’d stay on topic. Liberals have some weird fascination with Elon and Trump. I don’t get it.

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -31 year ago

                So which is it that prevents you from staying on topic?

                The topic is dink. Not your jealously or infatuation with elons billions.