Sean “Diddy” Combs was accused in a lawsuit on Wednesday of gang-raping a 17-year-old girl in 2003, marking the fourth sexual assault allegation lodged against the producer in recent weeks.

The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleges that she was flown on a private jet from Michigan to Combs’ recording studio in New York, where she was raped by three people, including Combs and Harve Pierre, the president of Bad Boy Entertainment.

According to the suit, Combs and his associates plied her with “copious amounts” of drugs and alcohol. The suit alleges that Combs raped her over a bathroom sink while she went in and out of consciousness, and that Combs then watched as a third man also raped her.

  • @ImTryingLemmy
    link
    English
    246 months ago

    y’all think he did it? I’m starting to think he did it.

        • @soren446
          link
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @surewhynotlem
            link
            56 months ago

            Seventeen year olds can’t consent. They’re incapable under the law. So even if she was into it, she literally couldn’t say yes. So it’s rape.

            If that’s something you disagree with, then work to get the law changed. But until that, they’re rapists and don’t blame the victim.

            • @soren446
              link
              2
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              deleted by creator

          • @Disco_Dougie
            link
            16 months ago

            Therapy might help with everything you said.

            • @interceder270
              link
              -56 months ago

              I think going outside would help you understand better.

          • @soren446
            link
            -2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • @interceder270
              link
              4
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I wasn’t talking about the law.

              I had sex at 17 with an adult and have 0 regrets. It’s pretty normal. I think I would’ve had more regrets if I refrained from doing it because people like you think that’s what I should do, lol.

              To put things into perspective and why it’s always good to talk specifics, I was 17 and she was 20. I guess she’s a shitty person who raped me and should be in prison, lol. We ended up being together for years, it was a great relationship :)

              But I guess from your ‘logic’, if this occurred in a different jurisdiction (or if I had waited 2 months for my 18th birthday,) then she would be off the hook for any and all judgement.

              It’s funny watching you people always pivot to the law as though every law is just and people are good based on how well they obey laws.

            • Tier 1 Build-A-Bear 🧸
              link
              English
              16 months ago

              Unfortunately there are still states where like 16 and 15 are the ages of consent

            • @deranger
              link
              0
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I saw your deleted reply; no I don’t think it’s appropriate, see my comment.

              First off: there is no federal age of consent law. You weren’t “going off” anything.

              What you said is factually untrue. You’d see that with a quick search. That’s all I’m saying.

              No, I don’t think it’s appropriate. It is, however fucked up, still legal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        106 months ago

        I mean, having sex with people of certain ages is illegal for a reason so it doesn’t actually matter if she was “willing” if she was under the age of consent. Also, drugging a person removes their ability to make an informed decision to consent so again, even if she did agree to it, her consent wasn’t valid on that point either. In other words, she wasn’t capable of consenting so, ya know, rape.

        • @interceder270
          link
          -76 months ago

          I’m not talking about convicting the perpetrator. Please stop assuming, lol.

          Legally speaking, there is no ambiguity.

          But in reality, there is. If you can’t understand that, it’s probably because you don’t want to.