Last November we had the opportunity to attend an exclusive twenty-minute screening of ‘Dune: Part II’, the highly anticipated second installment of the monumental adaptation of Frank Herbert’s science fiction classic that Denis Villeneuve is carrying out. Of course, it is early to give an opinion, but we can assure that there are reasons to think that This new installment could be even more stimulating than the first. We tell you why.

Via [email protected]

  • @mhague
    link
    English
    -2
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’ve only seen Frank Herbert’s Dune but I thought the new one was too quickly paced and consequently boring. It needed to be slowed down and allow the world of Dune to fully seep. There’s no chance that part two will fix this.

    • @dustyData
      link
      English
      25
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      My friend, it lasts two and a half hours and barely covers the first third of the first book. If it were any slower it would just be hours of shots of a rock being eroded by wind.

      • @BruceCampbellschin
        link
        English
        66 months ago

        And they would call that, “The Making of (a) Dune”.

        I’ll see myself out.

      • @ours
        link
        English
        46 months ago

        If Villeneuve is still the director, I would be watching it anyway.

      • @Beetschnapps
        link
        English
        36 months ago

        Yea but it could have hit 3 hours if they had written in Legolas.

      • livusOP
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        @dustyData

        hours of shots of a rock being eroded by wind.

        Ssssh don’t give them any ideas for the third installment.

      • @mhague
        link
        English
        26 months ago

        I wouldn’t mind some ‘uncomfortably long’ shots of rocks or something after the more storyful scenes. Like a 20 minute segment with no dialogue. We don’t get enough of that.

        Would go great in a spiritual scifi whose protagonist is a planet.

        • livusOP
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          Yeah it’s time the Slow Cinema movement turned its eye towards sci fi. :D

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy
      link
      English
      106 months ago

      Really? I mean it basically hit only half the story beats that Frank Herbert’s Dune did, and it was longer.

      Most people I know who complained about it complained about it being too slow at times and consequently boring. Not too fast. I personally thought it was fantastic, and I’m really looking forward to the second part.

    • livusOP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      @mhague I had the opposite problem, I felt like the pacing was off because it drags in the second act. I still want to see part 2 though.

      • @mhague
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I want to see the second too, the first’s visuals were interesting and even if I wanted it to be 3 hrs long it’s still more Dune.

        • livusOP
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          @mhague yeah it was spectacular to look at and I felt it was just getting interesting.